Go to Homepage
A Family of Community Newspapers Serving Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia
HomeCompany InfoAdvertising InfoClassifiedsFeedbackSearch


Weather
Sports
Viewpoints



Obituaries







Archives


Posted March 30, 2003


Rule of Law Alive in Herndon
Well, Hallellujia.
Herndon finally got an official opinion on whether the way it has chosen to deal with the day laborers is a good idea or a bad one.
It was a judicial opinion, actually. A Fairfax County judge declared last week that the town's ordinance which prohibits people from soliciting work on the streets is only constitutional because anyone may solicit work at the official day labor site.
Essentially, the judge's opinion is the first judicial ruling on the town's day labor site and non-solicitation ordinance, and it says that the town was right.
When the town developed the current approach to dealing with the day laborers who used to gather by the dozens near the 7-Eleven at Elden Street and Alabama Drive, it chose to do two things: open an official site where people can solicit work, and enact a law that prohibits people from soliciting work in a similar fashion anywhere else in town.
This was an approach developed by months of research into how other communities have dealt with the same problem and what the legal limitations of such a plan are. Former Mayor Michael O'Reilly, and his predecessor, Rick Thoesen, both discussed the town's problems and options with public officials across the nation, and federal officials here in Washington, D.C.
The consensus was that a locality cannot infringe on the right of people to assemble and to exercise free speech unless it provides an accessible location where people can exercise those rights.
Hence, the town could not pass a law outlawing people from standing around on any street corner waiting for people to stop by and offer them jobs unless it provided an official day labor site and made it open to everyone.
A man named Stephen Thomas parked his car at the 7-Eleven last September. He got out and walked up to some men. He negotiated for one of them to work for him, and then the two got into his car and drove away. Mr. Thomas received a ticket under the town's non-solicitation ordinance.
Mr. Thomas contested the charge on the grounds that as long as he wasn't a danger to traffic flow he should be allowed to stop his car, talk to whoever he chooses and hire someone to work for him if he so chooses.
Last week, Judge Lorraine Nordlund heard his argument in General District Court and ruled that the town's ordinance is appropriate because it serves the greater public good. But, she said the ordinance would be clearly against the U.S. Constitution if the town did not also have a site in town where people could go to hire day laborers.
"And if it were not for the town center, I would have to strike this ordinance," the judge said in her ruling. This is an important ruling, because it clearly shows that the town needs to have a day labor site open to anyone if it hopes to have an ordinance that controls day laborers in town.
Since the site was approved by the Town Council, the Herndon Official Workers' Center has been a lightning rod of controversy. It brought international attention to Herndon as the national debate on immigration raged on. Community groups opposed to the day labor site formed, and many people voiced their protests that the town's method of handling the day laborers unfairly benefits illegal immigrants as much as legal residents.
When Election Day arrived, all but one Town Council member who voted in favor of opening the day labor site was booted off the board, and voters swept in a new mayor and Town Council that has a different approach to dealing with the day laborers.
During the campaign and since being elected to office, most of the Town Council members have made clear that they oppose the Herndon Official Workers' Center specifically because it does not check a person's immigration status before allowing them to participate. Critics say this is criminal because it violates state and federal law that prohibits people from encouraging, supporting or aiding those who are in this country illegally.
Only about a month ago, the town staff, under the micro-managing direction of the Town Council, requested bids from companies to operate a day labor center modeled after a temp firm, where job applicants would be screened before being linked with prospective employers. Nobody entered a bid to the request.
The Town Council has worked these past few months to develop a day labor site that will check a person's residency status before allowing them to participate. But the judge's ruling last week clearly is the first indicator that the Town Council's idea of changing the current set-up probably won't work.
It won't work because the ordinance will be unconstitutional without an open day labor site. And laborers and employers won't have any incentive to use a labor site if there is no law prohibiting them from performing the same activity on the sidewalk in front of their homes.
Throughout the debate, critics of the town's policy and of the national immigration policy have said that they respect the rule of law, and that illegal immigrants have broken the law by entering this country.
The judge's ruling last week clearly shows that the rule of law has always been the foremost concern of previous Town Councils and mayors, and it was concern for the only law that matters in this debate: the U.S. Constitution.

Copyright © 2003 The Herndon Publishing Company

Back to top | Back to previous page


Home | Company Info | Advertising | Classifieds | Feedback | Search
Weather | Sports | Entertainment | Viewpoints | Obituaries | Milestones | Community Guide | Cookbook | History | Photo Album

Copyright © 2003 The Herndon Publishing Company
(703) 437-5886